Suggest place it near the letter to his wife. I'll also suggest the whole section seems a bit undue - what historians said or he wrote about his feelings simply was not a big part of his life events or impact and is save described as not done much about - but this text seems. (Why are they"s anyway? Makes it look like synth edits.) Markbassett ( talk ) 05:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC) Support (V. Conditional) the amount of text seems excessive and could be reduced to a sentence or two - possibly alongside the 'wife' letter. I also endorse the comments made by markbassett and Gwillhickers about inapt phrasing. Pincrete ( talk ) 15:29, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Support inclusion of passage. Personal correspondence to a family member provides insight into the views of a historical figure.
Instead of saying "But lee hoped for. we instead should say "lee wrote that. adding no further opinion of our own, which tvh hasn't done here. Using primary sources: Policy: Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in wikipedia, but only with care. There is no Original Research here because the proposal doesn't advance any unusual or radical idea. Lee's memoirs have been reputably published by numerous publishers over the years, are widely recognized by historians, as are jefferson's and reviews Grant's memoirs. As controversial issues go, it's important to be clear about all perspectives for the readers. gwillhickers ( talk ) 22:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Support when attributed as 'lee wrote' instead of phrased as an analysis 'lee hoped for which seems what some of the oppose editors are objecting about. I also vaguely recall other works talking to his dislike of slavery that might be good or better to use, but this would do for now.
The maximum was raised from seven to twenty some time ago, subsequently to fifty circa august 2015. The user names need not be on the same line as the signature, merely on a newly-created line; provided that the signature is also on a newly-created line (not necessarily the same one and all these lines were created in the same edit, a notification. redrose64 ( talk ) 00:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Sorry for saying "line" when I meant "edit". I received Redrose64's ping just now - none for the RfC. onroe iii ( talk ) 01:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the assist. I'm still trying iterations, without success yet. Thanks to both though. TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 11:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Survey edit support edit support inclusion of passage, which is more inclusive than the previous iteration, expanding the previous two elements to eight by carefully using"s from wp:primary sources as sourced. 19:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC) TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 19:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Support (conditional) first, i would change some of the language in the above proposal.
Say, on -pay corporate securities Law Blog
In RfCs, the "Survey" section is normally reserved for!votes of support or oppose with their own explanation, since they are wp:notvotes, but opinions adding weight to reach consensus, not based on popularity, etc. In addition, the "Threaded discussion" section is normally for actual threaded discussions about issues in the discussion, not votes. I suggest quickly re-ordering these sections to allow for typical RfC progress. onroe iii ( talk ) 20:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Clarification of the survey made in accordance with wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example formatting. Explicit support and opposition to the passage in its second revision which answers the previous objections is of interest here, - as the inclusive changes embracing editor comments seem to have been ignored in discussion here at Talk. TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 07:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC) This RfC does not follow the example formatting; the example includes several uses. These each represent different editors adding separate comments, not all done at once by the single originating editor.
Please look at other complete RfCs. RfC formatting is up to the proposer, but there's a good reason for following the example formatting. As currently structured, this RfC is bound to fail. By presenting this RfC as black and white, with only "Support" or "Oppose" options with reasoning pre-selected, tends to eliminate any chance of some consensus - an agreement of ideas that may satisfy most everyone. RfCs that end with a simple majority (60 or so) in favor with no new middle-ground or compromise presented that actually resolves the issue, are almost always closed with "no consensus which yields no change to the article - the same result as everyone voting. (Also, i'm pretty sure none of those pings worked. They have to be on the same line as your signature, no more than a few at a time, homework each group with its own new signature.) - onroe iii ( talk ) 16:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC) @ onroe iii : They will have worked.
TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 19:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Should the lees views on race and slavery" section contain the passage with information from lees letter to his son from Texas and Congressional hearings,"d. Long as sourced, and (1) expanding the elements of lees belief reported in the article and (2) replacing the block" partially mirroring the letter with text written in an encyclopedic style? TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 19:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC) In an 1856 letter from Texas to his son from his Texas frontier post, lee described slavery to be an institution of what he called a moral and political evil, detrimental to both slave and master. But he acceded to the inevitability of slavery under the. Constitution during his own time. While lee expressed his feelings were strongly enlisted in behalf of the colored race, he expressed a greater concern for the damage being done whites under slavery.
Additionally he saw slavery as what he termed "a painful discipline for those enslaved, associating it with improving the colored race compared to its African roots cultures by Christianization during its time of captivity. 1 But lee wrote of better things for African Americans, and that with prayerful support, the "sure influence of Christianity" would bring about the final abolition of human slavery as an act of Gods doctrine on earth in what lee conceived as a miracle. Regardless of slaverys ultimate extinction as Gods "doctrine lee did not believe that an end of slavery should come at the hands of what he termed "unlawful violent action" by Abolitionists whether in civil war or servile insurrection, 2 nor did he believe the institution. From a letter of lee's from Texas to his wife dated December 27, 1856. From Congressional testimony to congress, february 25, 1868. TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 19:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC) The concrete objections to the initial proposal have been met in the updated markup to the best of my ability. All of the elements in the current text in the article are preserved, including that lee expressed a greater concern for the damage being done whites under slavery. TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 05:53, (UTC) point of order.
Say you won't go blake
Lee of essay a proposed restatement of a wp:primary source which is contains more points than the existing block" from the letter. The primary source is a 1856 letter of lees to his son from Texas as found at Long,. L., memoirs of Robert. Lee: his military and personal history (1886. Opponents have seen wp:original research in the proposal as drawing conclusions not found in the primary source. TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 20:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC) TheVirginiahistorian ( talk ) 10:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Additionally, @ Shadowfax0 @ Alexandre8 @ Bilsonius @ Johnlumea @ Kelvan. F @ Genkineko @ deisenbe @ onroe iii @ Gwillhickers @ Rjensen @ Infrogmation.
It was the basic moral of his religion that showed that slavery was not a sustainable attribute as America grew past these futile times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ( talk ) 08:39, (utc rfC about the use of wp:primary sources and the proposed passage edit The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary presentation of the conclusions reached follows. Clear consensus against inclusion, due to concerns about original research and a desire for the use of secondary sources for contextualization and determining due weight. Galobtter ( pingó mió ) 12:20, (UTC) Talk page contributors: @ Smmurphy, dimadick, snooganssnoogans, theVirginiahistorian, moxy, daniel Case, gedcke, iac-62, neutrality,. K, anythingyouwant, elonka, princewilliam3, and Darthkenobi0. You are receiving this notice for an RfC at Talk:Robert.
not correct that Robert. Lee spent the majority of his time in northern or border states. His first assignment out of the military academy was in savannah, ga where he helped coordinate the construction of forts for many years. Also he was stationed in la for long periods of time fighting in the mexican-American War. This should be changed as you used the fact that he did not live in far southern state so he could not relate the real slavery. Actually virginia his home state was large in plantation cropping and slavery. His domain of living did not have any outlook on his view on slavery.
State of, virginia on wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list paper of open tasks. B, this article has been rated. B-class on the project's quality scale. Top, this article has been rated. Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope. Wikiproject Homeschooling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of homeschooling -related topics on wikipedia. Low, this article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary, and cast - wattpad
Lee was a, history good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also essay seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Current status: Former good article nominee, this article is of interest to the following. Wikiprojects : This article is within the scope. Wikiproject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the.