Yes, archeologists, linguists, historians, biologists and anthropologists repeatedly pointed out numerous anachronisms contained in a presumably impeccable text, but Mormon scholars save were always capable of finding explanations for why they were present there sometimes rather far-fetched, but more or less believable. However, the book of Mormon doesnt stand very well against the genetic evidence, and even those scholars who are members of the lds themselves more and more often are forced to admit. One of them, Thomas. Murphy, was heavily criticized and even got under threat of excommunication from the church for his essay lamanite genesis, genealogy and Genetics. In it he supported the point of view that has been dominant in mainstream scientific community for a long time: that genetic evidence proves without any possible doubt that Native americans have nothing to do whatsoever with the Israelites and instead originate from East Asia. Nevertheless, it seems that this proof did little to persuade the lds majority, even those of them belonging to scientific community. Lds-affiliated scholars like john Sorenson and John.
And right now we will show you a sample of the an essay written on one of them. Exploratory Essay on Scientific evidence and the Anthropology of book of Mormon. The teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day saints (LDS) in the area of anthropology have been a subject of much debate ever since the foundation of this fairly young religion. According to the book of Mormon, some 4,200 years ago a lost tribe of Israelites travelled across the Atlantic Ocean to an uninhabited region in Central America. There they eventually divided into two separate peoples, the nephites and the lamanites. After a 200-year period of complete peace the two nations waged a large-scale war against each other, as a result of which the nephites, which are described as highly-developed light-skinned people, were complete wiped out by the lamanites, which are characterized as idle and wicked. The lamanites settled all over the Americas, becoming the ancestors of the native americans, effectively making them a lost tribe of Israel. The book of Mormon is perceived by the lds as a divinely inspired revelation, so the Israelite roots of Native americans are one of the principal tenets of the religion while going against everything stated by mainstream historiography. However, prior to relatively recent advances in dna analysis there wasnt any irrefutable evidence for or against the claims made by the book of Mormon.
Contemporary Ethnography of lds missionaries and their Psychological Identity. Criticism of the book of Mormon on the part of Traditional Archaeology. Mormon Polygamy from an Anthropological point of view. Lds efforts to Establish book of Mormon Archeology. Lds apology of book of Mormon Inconsistency with Archaeological and Anthropological Findings. Cultural Analysis of lds society, interesting topics, arent they? They are based on 10 facts on anthropology of Mormonism prepared specially for you. You can check out the tips on exploratory essay writing as well.
College Scholarship Program - mensa
So feel free to use one of these: digital Mormonism from an Anthropological point of view. Scientific evidence and the Anthropology of book of Mormon. Anthropological Problems in the book of Mormon. Mormon view on the genesis of the native americans. Mormon Anthropological Claims and Genetic evidence. Ancient History of Human Race in the Americas According to the book of Mormon.
Ancestral Connection between Indigenous Americans and Ancient Middle-eastern Tribes in the book of Mormon. The book of Mormon and the Anthropology of Mesoamerica. Nephites, lamanites and Native americans, lds community and the Proof of East-Asian Origins of Native americans. Lds model for Human Migration in view of evidence Presented by molecular Anthropology, archaeology and Linguistic Studies. Scientific evidence of lds and Biblical Models for Human Migratory history. Archaeological Proof for the book of Mormon According to lds community. Non-Mormon view on the book of Mormon Archaeological and Anthropological evidence.
So while we must be passionate about our viewpoint, we need to be careful that we do not overdo the emotional plea part. The reader is not gullible and will see through anything that does not ring true. As you close the essay, it is most important to clearly redefine the topic and restate the most compelling evidence cited in original form. Build to a memorable conclusion. Conclusions are what readers are most likely to remember. Repeat or restate your thesis.
Drive home the importance of your ideas, and make sure that your conclusion is the strongest, most dynamic part of your essay by calling your reader to action or by stressing the importance of the points you have made. Remember, this is the last chance to remind the reader and convince him/her to accept your position. Do not introduce new material in the conclusion. You have finally done it! Achieved the near perfect essay! When you have to write an exploratory essay on a topic you are not very familiar with, it is often a real stumbling block. After all, instead of proving your own point of view, you have to gather information, check the facts and present your findings in an unbiased manner, and maintaining this objectivity may be difficult. However, when you already have a topic at your disposal, it becomes easier to concentrate your thoughts on a particular subject without having to imagine from which direction you are supposed to approach.
The lee-jackson Educational, foundation
Having acknowledged this, you then proceed by showing how your way to this goal is the best way. A solid way to seem reasonable is to acknowledge the main opposing view(s) but to show subtly how your view is more reasonable. We must Use logic to establish credibility with readers. If logical fallacies creep in, the argument does not hold and falls through. Ethos- deals with the appeal to character, the sense of right and wrong, the sense of justice and fair play. Your make argument will triumph by persuading the reader to identify himself with these traits, and acknowledge that this is exactly how he feels. Pathos is the appeal to emotion, which is inherent in every one. It has often been said that when emotion enters through the door, reason departs.
The concept of Argument has 2 sides to it— proposition and opposition. In order to persuade the opposition, you need to take into account their beliefs and see how different effectively you can make the transition from one level of acceptance to another, but to win acceptance, you must not only explain and support your proposition, but also. Herein lies the secret of persuasive argumentation. Having said this, we need to take a long hard look at the kind of reader we are targeting. Whether we have a neutral reader that is undecided, a hostile reader who is openly defiant or a reader who is willing to be led is going to determine the strategy that we adopt. Logos, ethos and pathos are the paths that we have to tread so that we do not step on anyones toes. Logos is the appeal to reason.—This is an age old ploy for everyone likes to think he is reasonable and appealing to this sense is perhaps the most effective way to get them to alter their stance. An effective way of convincing someone that you are reasonable is to find the common ground that exists between you. This is an outcome that is common to you both an end-point you both desire.
is important in clarifying our opinions. Explaining exactly why we hold certain opinions and arguing in support of them helps us to clarify our own thinking. Generally, we cannot resist attempting to persuade others to our point of view. However this defies the very spirit of argumentation, because effective argumentation does not attempt to declare a winner, nor does it tax the intelligence of the reader. The facts and viewpoints are there for all to behold and effectively argued views allow for the formation of opinions based on what is before them. One essential characteristic of argument is the sense of opposition. . Remember, you arent simply explaining a concept to someone who will hear you out and accept or reject your idea on its merit.
They are both styles of writing that seek to influence in different ways. However in order to indulge in Persuasive argumentation, we need to understand what an argument is and why at all we argue. So what is an argument? An argument has been defined to be a well-structured, well-reasoned and well-supported point of view on a topic about which there will be good reasons for disagreement. Since an argument is a logical presentation of a topic supported by reasons, the argumentative essay presents one side of an issue using evidence to convince the reader to draw the same conclusions as the author. Personal opinions and insight may be the foundation of argumentative essay, but reason, evidence, and factual information must support the personal opinions to prove the argument. Having defined argument, the bigger writing question is Why do we argue? Argumentation is a process through which we form our own judgments and opinions.
Foundation Programs - siouxland Community
Argumentative essays, the term argument is defined as a contentious exchange of views, a heated discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against a proposition or a proposal with people violently defending their points of view. This negative image seems to imply that the argumentation process is meant to cause conflict rather than resolve. But, its two famous teachers Aristotle and Cicero changed all this. Arguments were invented to persuade others to alter or compromise their position on a certain topic. Persuasion would be the ability to cause someone to change his belief and adapt another belief or take another course of action. Hence, strange as it may seem, the two are complementary. Writing to argue and persuade need similar skills and a closely similar style.shakespeare